Criteria and indicators to evaluate quality of care in genitourinary tumour boards.

PURPOSE: Genitourinary (GU) multidisciplinary tumour boards (GUMTBs) are key components of patient care, as they might lead to changes in treatment plan, improved survival, and increased adherence to guidelines. However, there are no guidelines on how GUMTBs should operate or how to assess their quality of performance. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify criteria and indicators to evaluate quality in GUMTBs. A scientific committee-comprising 12 GU cancer specialists from seven disciplines-proposed a list of criteria and developed indicators, evaluated in two rounds of Delphi method. Appropriateness and utility of indicators were scored using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as at least two-thirds of Delphi respondents selecting a score sub-category that encompassed the median score of the group. RESULTS: Forty-five criteria were selected to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs covering five dimensions: organisation, personnel, protocol and documentation, resources, and interaction with patients. Then, 33 indicators were developed and evaluated in the first round of Delphi, leading to a selection of 26 indicators in two dimensions: function, governance and resources, and GUMTB sessions. In the second round, consensus was reached on the appropriateness of all 26 indicators and on the utility of 24 of them. Index cards for criteria and indicators were developed to be used in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Criteria and indicators were developed to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs, aiming to serve as a guide to improve quality of care and health outcomes in patients with GU cancer.

Extracellular Vesicles' Genetic Cargo as Noninvasive Biomarkers in Cancer: A Pilot Study Using ExoGAG Technology.

The two most developed biomarkers in liquid biopsy (LB)-circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA-have been joined by the analysis of extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs are lipid-bilayer enclosed structures released by all cell types containing a variety of molecules, including DNA, mRNA and miRNA. However, fast, efficient and a high degree of purity isolation technologies are necessary for their clinical routine implementation. In this work, the use of ExoGAG, a new easy-to-use EV isolation technology, was validated for the isolation of EVs from plasma and urine samples. After demonstrating its efficiency, an analysis of the genetic material contained in the EVs was carried out. Firstly, the sensitivity of the detection of point mutations in DNA from plasma EVs isolated by ExoGAG was analyzed. Then, a pilot study of mRNA expression using the nCounter NanoString platform in EV-mRNA from a healthy donor, a benign prostate hyperplasia patient and metastatic prostate cancer patient plasma and urine samples was performed, identifying the prostate cancer pathway as one of the main ones. This work provides evidence for the value of using ExoGAG for the isolation of EVs from plasma and urine samples, enabling downstream applications of the analysis of their genetic cargo.

Cytotoxicity Assessment of a New Design for a Biodegradable Ureteral Mitomycin Drug-Eluting Stent in Urothelial Carcinoma Cell Culture.

Urothelial tumour of the upper urinary tract is a rare neoplasm, but unfortunately, it has a high recurrence rate. The reduction of these tumour recurrences could be achieved by the intracavitary instillation of adjuvant chemotherapy after nephron-sparing treatment in selected patients, but current instillation methods are ineffective. Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the cytotoxic capacity of a new instillation technology through a biodegradable ureteral stent/scaffold coated with a silk fibroin matrix for the controlled release of mitomycin C as an anti-cancer drug. Through a comparative study, we assessed, in urothelial carcinoma cells in a human cancer T24 cell culture for 3 and 6 h, the cytotoxic capacity of mitomycin C by viability assay using the CCK-8 test (Cell counting Kit-8). Cell viability studies in the urothelial carcinoma cell line confirm that mitomycin C embedded in the polymeric matrix does not alter its cytotoxic properties and causes a significant decrease in cell viability at 6 h versus in the control groups. These findings have a clear biomedical application and could be of great use to decrease the recurrence rate in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinomas by increasing the dwell time of anti-cancer drugs.

European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Renal Stones.

BACKGROUND: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become the preferred treatment modality for nephrolithiasis. However, because of ongoing uncertainties regarding the optimal perioperative management, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up, as well as a lack of standardization for outcome reporting, consensus is needed to achieve more uniform clinical practice worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for RIRS on the basis of existing data and expert consensus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A protocol-driven, three-phase study was conducted by the European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU). The process included: (1) a nonsystematic review of the literature to define domains for discussion; (2) a two-round modified Delphi survey involving experts in this field; and (3) an additional group meeting and third-round survey involving 64 senior representative members to formulate the final conclusions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The results from each previous round were returned to the participants for re-evaluation of their decisions during the next round. The agreement threshold was set at 70%. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The panel included 209 participants who developed 29 consensus statements on the following topics of interest: (1) perioperative infection management; (2) perioperative antithrombotic therapy; (3) fundamentals of the operative technique; and (4) standardized outcome reporting. Although this consensus can be considered as a useful reference for more clinically oriented daily practice, we also acknowledge that a higher level of evidence from further clinical trials is needed. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements aim to guide and standardize clinical practice and research on RIRS and to recommend standardized outcome reporting. PATIENT SUMMARY: An international consensus on the best practice for minimally invasive surgery for kidney stones was organized and developed by two international societies. It is anticipated that this consensus will provide further guidance to urologists and may help to improve clinical outcomes for patients.

Detection of Circulating Serum Protein Biomarkers of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer after Protein Corona-Silver Nanoparticles Analysis by SWATH-MS.

Because cystoscopy is expensive and invasive, a new method of detecting non-invasive muscular bladder cancer (NMIBC) is needed. This study aims to identify potential serum protein markers for NMIBC to improve diagnosis and to find treatment approaches that avoid disease progression to a life-threatening phenotype (muscle-invasive bladder cancer, MIBC). Here, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs, 9.73 ± 1.70 nm) as a scavenging device together with sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS) were used to quantitatively analyze the blood serum protein alterations in two NMIBC subtypes, T1 and Ta, and they were compared to normal samples (HC). NMIBC's analysis of serum samples identified three major groups of proteins, the relative content of which is different from the HC content: proteins implicated in the complement and coagulation cascade pathways and apolipoproteins. In conclusion, many biomarker proteins were identified that merit further examination to validate their useful significance and utility within the clinical management of NMIBC patients.

Blood-based protein biomarkers in bladder urothelial tumors.

Bladder cancer (BC) is the fifth most common cancer with a high prevalence rate. It is classically classified in two groups, namely non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) and muscle invasive (MIBC). NMIBC accounts for 75% of cases and has a better prognosis than MIBC. However, 30-50% of the NMIBC patients will show recurrences throughout their lives, and about 10-20% of them will progress to MIBC, with frequent metastasis and a reduced survival rate. The diagnosis of bladder cancer is confirmed by direct visualization of the tumour and other mucosal abnormalities with endoscopic excision using cystoscopy and transurethral resection of the bladder (TURBT). An adequate TURBT requires complete resection of all visible tumour with appropriate sampling of the bladder to assess the depth of invasion. However, for many years, researchers have attempted to identify and utilise urinary markers for bladder cancer detection. Voided urine cytology has been the mainstay of urine-based diagnosis of bladder cancer since originally described by Papanicolau and Marshall. Nonetheless, urine cytology has several drawbacks, including a poor sensitivity for low-grade/stage tumours, a lack of interobserver consistency and a variable range of readings (e.g., atypical, atypical-suspicious, non-diagnostic). These shortcomings have inspired the search for more sensitive bladder cancer biomarkers. To bring precision medicine to genitourinary oncology, the analysis of the plasma/serum wide genome and proteome offers promising possibilities.

The SCQ-SCORE: initial validation of a new scoring system for elective stone surgery prioritization in the COVID-19 era.

INTRODUCTION: Endourology waiting lists have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and prioritization strategies are needed. Some tiered classifications have been put forward aimed at prioritizing patients by using criteria related with clinical severity or social impact of stone disease, yet no quantitative system has been published to date. The objective of this study is to present a new quantitative scoring system for elective stone surgery prioritization and show its intra- and inter-rater reliability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A scoring system coined 'SCQ-score' was set up, which consists of 9 variables: infection (ranges 0-3), obstruction (0-3), indwelling time (0-3), admissions (0-3), symptoms (0-2), ureteral location (0-1), solitary or suboptimal kidney (0-1), chronic kidney disease (0-1) and presence of percutaneous nephrostomy (0-1).The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the SCQ-score was prospectively validated in 60 consecutive patients on the waiting list, by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The SCQ-score demonstrated having an excellent interobserver agreement (ICC >0.75) for the final score and its different domains. After 4 weeks, a second analysis was carried out to measure its intra-rater reliability, which was also excellent. On average, 134.9 ±50 seconds were required to complete the SCQ-score. CONCLUSIONS: The SCQ-score is a new quantitative system to help prioritize elective stone surgeries, which has been shown to be user-friendly and to have an excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability. Initially developed to help during the COVID-19 pandemic, its utility will probably remain of interest in the post-COVID-19 era to ensure a fairer access to stone surgery.

Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study.

BACKGROUND: Double J ureteral stents are widely used on urological patients to provide drainage of the upper urinary tract. Unfourtunately, ureteral stents are not free from complications, as bacterial colonization and require a second procedure for removal. The purpose of the current comparative experimental study is to evaluate a new heparin-coated biodegradable antireflux ureteral stent (BraidStent®-H) to prevent urinary bacterial colonization. METHODS: A total of 24 female pigs were underwent determination of bacteriuria and nephrosonographic, endoscopic and contrast fluoroscopy assessment of the urinary tract. Afterward, were randomly assigned animals to Group-I, in which a 5Fr double-pigtail ureteral stent was placed for 6 weeks, or Group-II, in which a BraidStent®-H was placed. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1, 3, 6, 8, 12 weeks. The final follow-up includes the above methods and an exhaustive pathological study of the urinary tract was accomplished after 20 weeks. RESULTS: Bacteriuria findings in the first 48 h were significant between groups at 6 h and 12 h. Asymptomatic bacteriuria does not reach 100% of the animals in Group-II until 48 h versus Group-I where it appears at 6 h. The weekly bacteriuria mean rate was 27.7% and 44.4% in Group I and II respectively, without statistical significance. In Group II there were no animals with vesicoureteral reflux, with statistical significance at 3 and 6 weeks with Group-I. The 91.2% of stents in Group-II were degraded between 3 and 6 weeks, without obstructive fragments. Distal ureteral peristalsis was maintained in 66.6-75% in Group-II at 1-6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The heparin coating of BraidStent® allows an early decrease of bacterial colonization, but its effectiveness is low at the long term. Heparin coating did not affect scheduled degradation rate or size of stents fragments. BraidStent®-H avoids the side effects associated with current ureteral stents, thus should cause less discomfort to patients.

Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled "Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy" held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019. RESULTS: New-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). CONCLUSION: Recent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient.

Reduction of ureteral stent encrustation by modulating the urine pH and inhibiting the crystal film with a new oral composition: a multicenter, placebo controlled, double blind, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Encrustation of ureteral double J stents is a common complication that may affect its removal. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new oral composition to prevent double J stent encrustation in indwelling times up to 8 weeks. METHODS: A double-blinded, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 105 patients with indwelling double J stents enrolled across 9 public hospitals in Spain. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) into intervention (53 patients) or placebo (52 patients) groups for 3 to 8 weeks and both groups self-monitored daily their morning urine pH levels. The primary outcome of analysis was the degree of stent ends encrustation, defined by a 4-point score (0 - none; 3 - global encrustation) using macroscopic and electron microscopy analysis of crystals, after 3 to 8-w indwelling period. Score was exponentially transformed according to calcium levels. Secondary endpoints included urine pH decrease, stent removal, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: The intervention group benefits from a lower global encrustation rate of stent ends than placebo group (1% vs 8.2%; p < 0.018). Mean encrustation score was 85.12 (274.5) in the placebo group and 18.91 (102.27) in the intervention group (p < 0.025). Considering the secondary end points, treated patients reported greater urine pH decreases (p = 0.002). No differences in the incidence of adverse events were identified between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the use of this new oral composition is beneficial in the context of ureteral double J indwelling by decreasing mean, as well as global encrustation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under the name "Combined Use of a Medical Device and a Dietary Complement in Patient Urinary pH Control in Patients With an Implanted Double J Stent" with date 2nd November 2017, code NCT03343275, and URL.

[Current status for urpper tract transitional cell carcinoma during COVID-19 pandemia.] / Situación actual de los tumores del tracto urinario superior en el contexto de la pandemia por Covid-19.

INTRODUCTION: First cases of COVID-19 were reported in China on December 2019 and rapidly spread globally. The explosive increase in number of cases requiring hospitalization has led to a delay in a big number of surgical interventions, including oncologic surgeries. Collateral effects of this increase means a challenge for urologists, who have been forced to redistribute their resources. Due to its poor pronostic, patients suffering from by upper tract urinary tumours will be negatively affected by this pandemic. METHODS: A non sistematic review was performed using literature published until May 23, 2020, using "Uppertract urothelial tumours", "COVID-19" and "nephroureterectomy".as keywords. The resulting manuscript was critically revised by national authors in order to establish common criteria about treatment and follow up. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Four studies were identified that assessed the impact of delaying radical nephrouretrectomy as curative treatment. These studies showed that surgery delays decrease overall survival and cancer specific survival rates in high-risk groups. On the other hand, delaying radical nephrouretrectomy due to ureteroscopy did not affect survival in cohorts of patients with predominately low-grade disease. CONCLUSIONS: A delay in curative treatment of upper tract urothelial tumours for more than three months results in adverse outcomes as overal survival and cancer specific survival. Hence, it is important to prioritize the timely care of this group of patients as far as COVID-19 pandemic allows it.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los primeros casos de la enfermedad por coronavirus (Coronavirus Disease 19, también denominada COVID-19) aparecieron en China en diciembre de 2019, desde donde se extendieron al resto del mundo. La rápida aparición de casos y el alto volumen de pacientes que han requerido hospitalización han provocado la demora de un gran número de intervenciones quirúrgicas, incluidas las cirugías oncológicas. Todo ello está suponiendo un reto para los servicios de urología de todo el mundo, y obliga a una redistribución de sus recursos. Los pacientes con tumores del tracto urotelial superior (TUS), en muchos casos de mal pronóstico, se pueden ver potencialmente afectadospor esta situación.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda no sistemática en web y en PubMed utilizando las palabras clave "Upper tract urothelial tumours", "COVID-19" , "nephroureterectomy". Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura incluyendo solo artículos y documentos escritos en lengua española e inglesa. Se remitió el documento a varios autores nacionales expertos en patología del urotelio superior, con el fin de unificar criterios y experiencias para llegar a un rápido consenso sobre la importancia relativa de las distintas actividades, problemas y soluciones. EVIDENCIA CIENTÍFICA: Diversos estudios tratan de determinar el impacto que presenta el retraso en la realización de la nefroureterectomía como tratamiento curativo, siendo el punto de corte de 3 meses en la mayoría de ellos. Tres de ellos concluyen que dicha demora implica una disminución de la supervivencia global y cáncer específica, mientras que el retraso de la nefroureterectomía radical debido a la realización de ureterorrenoscopia (URS) como tratamiento conservador en tumores de bajo grado no parece tener impacto en la supervivencia. CONCLUSIONES: El retraso en el tratamiento de los tumores del TUS a 3 meses supone una disminución de la supervivencia global y cáncer específica. Por ello, el tratamiento de esta patología no debería demorarse, en la medida en que los recursos hospitalarios y la alerta sanitaria por COVID-19 lo permita.

[Strategies and recommendations for urolithiasis treatment and follow-up in COVID-19 pandemia.] / Estrategias y recomendaciones para el tratamiento y seguimiento de la patología litiásica en el periodo de la pandemia COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The health crisis caused by COVID-19 pandemic has led to a restructuring of urological activity in order not to delay priority situations. An important part to prioritize within Urologyis Urolithiasis. The objective of this article is to establish strategies and recommendations for the treatment and follow-up in COVID-19 pandemic in phases I, II and III, based on available scientific evidence and the consensus of a group of experts in these pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The document is based on the evidence available in the literature so far on SARSCoV-2 and the experience of the authors in the management of COVID-19 in their institutions. A narrative review of the literature was conducted, and a modified nominal group technique was used due to the extraordinary restrictions of assembly and mobility during the pandemic. RESULTS: Recommendations are made regarding the epidemiological evaluation of patients before surgery ,the management of positive patients, the epidemiological measures for healthcare personnel, the management of renal colic, the type of anesthesia, endourological surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, hospitalization, clinicalt ests, out-patient service and priorities on the surgical waiting list. CONCLUSION: Treatment of Urolithiasis in COVID-19 pandemic calls for prioritization of patients, maximum efficiency in treatments, adequate protection of healthcare personnel, and the implementation of telemedicine as a measure to reduce patient attendance to the hospital.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La crisis sanitaria provocada por la pandemia COVID-19 ha obligado a reestructurar la actividad urológica para no demorar situaciones que requieran preferencia. Una parte importante para priorizar dentro de la Urología es la patología litiásica. El objetivo de este artículo es establecer estrategias y recomendaciones para el tratamiento y seguimiento de esta en el periodo de pandemia COVID-19 en las fases I II y III, basadas en la evidencia científica publicada y el consenso de un grupo de expertos en esta patología. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El documento se basa en la escasa evidencia en la literatura sobre SARS-CoV-2 y la experiencia de los autores en el manejo de COVID-19 en sus instituciones. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura y se utilizó una técnica de grupo nominal modificada debido a las restricciones extraordinarias de reunión y movilidad durante la pandemia. RESULTADOS: Se establecen recomendaciones sobre la evaluación epidemiológica de los pacientes antes de la cirugía, el manejo de los pacientes positivos, las medidas epidemiológicas para los profesionales, el manejo del cólico renal, el tipo de anestesia, la cirugía endourológica, la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque, la hospitalización, las pruebas complementarias, la consulta y las prioridades en la lista de espera quirúrgica. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento de la patología litiásica durante la pandemia COVID-19 hace necesaria la priorización de pacientes, la máxima eficiencia en los tratamientos, una protección adecuada del personal sanitario y la implementación de la telemedicina como medida para reducir la asistencia de los pacientes al medio hospitalario.

Situación actual de los tumores del tracto urinario superior en el contexto de la pandemia por Covid-19 / Current status for urpper tract transitional cell carcinoma during COVID-19 pandemia

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los primeros casos de la enfermedad por coronavirus (Coronavirus Disease 19, también denominada COVID-19) aparecieron en China en diciembre de 2019, desde donde se extendieron al resto del mundo. La rápida aparición de casos y el alto volumen de pacientes que han requerido hospitalización han provocado la demora de un gran número de intervenciones quirúrgicas, incluidas las cirugías oncológicas. Todo ello está suponiendo un reto para los servicios de urología de todo el mundo, y obliga a una redistribución de sus recursos. Los pacientes con tumores del tracto urotelial superior (TUS), en muchos casos de mal pronóstico, se pueden ver potencialmente afectadospor esta situación. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda no sistemática en web y en PubMed utilizando las palabras clave "Upper tract urothelial tumours", "COVID-19", "nephroureterectomy". Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura incluyendo solo artículos y documentos escritos en lengua española e inglesa. Se remitió el documento a varios autores nacionales expertos en patología del urotelio superior, con el fin de unificar criterios y experiencias para llegar a un rápido consenso sobre la importancia relativa de las distintas actividades, problemas y soluciones. EVIDENCIA CIENTÍFICA: Diversos estudios tratan de determinar el impacto que presenta el retraso en la realización de la nefroureterectomía como tratamiento curativo, siendo el punto de corte de 3 meses en la mayoría de ellos. Tres de ellos concluyen que dicha demora implica una disminución de la supervivencia global y cáncer específica, mientras que el retraso de la nefroureterectomía radical debido a la realización de ureterorrenoscopia (URS) como tratamiento conservador en tumores de bajo grado no parece tener impacto en la supervivencia. CONCLUSIONES: El retraso en el tratamiento de los tumores del TUS a 3 meses supone una disminución de la supervivencia global y cáncer específica. Por ello, el tratamiento de esta patología no debería demorarse, en la medida en que los recursos hospitalarios y la alerta sanitaria por COVID-19 lo permita

INTRODUCTION: First cases of COVID-19 were reported in China on December 2019 and rapidly spread globally. The explosive increase in number of cases requiring hospitalization has led to a delay in a big number of surgical interventions, including oncologic surgeries. Collateral effects of this increase means a challenge for urologists, who have been forced to redistribute their resources. Due to its poor pronostic, patients suffering from by upper tract urinary tumours will be negatively affected by this pandemic. METHODS: A non sistematic review was performed using literature published until May 23, 2020, using "Upper tract urothelial tumours", "COVID-19" and "nephroureterectomy". as keywords. The resulting manuscript was critically revised by national authors in order to establish common criteria about treatment and follow up. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Four studies were identified that assessed the impact of delaying radical nephrouretrectomy as curative treatment. These studies showed that surgery delays decrease overall survival and cancer specific survival rates in high-risk groups. On the other hand, delaying radical nephrouretrectomy due to ureteroscopy did not affect survival in cohorts of patients with predominately low-grade disease. CONCLUSIONS: A delay in curative treatment of upper tract urothelial tumours for more than three months results in adverse outcomes as overal survival and cancer specific survival. Hence, it is important to prioritize the timely care of this group of patients as far as COVID-19 pandemic allows it

Estrategias y recomendaciones para el tratamiento y seguimiento de la patología litiásica en el periodo de la pandemia COVID-19 / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: La crisis sanitaria provocada por la pandemia COVID-19 ha obligado a reestructurar la actividad urológica para no demorar situaciones que requieran preferencia. Una parte importante para priorizar dentro de la Urología es la patología litiásica. El objetivo de este artículo es establecer estrategias y recomendaciones para el tratamiento y seguimiento de esta en el periodo de pandemia COVID-19 en las fases I II y III, basadas en la evidencia científica publicada y el consenso de un grupo de expertos en esta patología. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El documento se basa en la escasa evidencia en la literatura sobre SARS-CoV-2 y la experiencia de los autores en el manejo de COVID-19 en sus instituciones. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura y se utilizó una técnica de grupo nominal modificada debido a las restricciones extraordinarias de reunión y movilidad durante la pandemia. RESULTADOS: Se establecen recomendaciones sobre la evaluación epidemiológica de los pacientes antes de la cirugía, el manejo de los pacientes positivos, las medidas epidemiológicas para los profesionales, el manejo del cólico renal, el tipo de anestesia, la cirugía endourológica, la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque, la hospitalización, las pruebas complementarias, la consulta y las prioridades en la lista de espera quirúrgica. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento de la patología litiásica durante la pandemia COVID-19 hace necesaria la priorización de pacientes, la máxima eficiencia en los tratamientos, una protección adecuada del personal sanitario y la implementación de la telemedicina como medida para reducir la asistencia de los pacientes al medio hospitalario

INTRODUCTION: The health crisis caused by COVID-19 pandemic has led to a restructuring of urological activity in order not to delay priority situations. An important part to prioritize within Urology is Urolithiasis. The objective of this article is to establish strategies and recommendations for the treatment and follow-up in COVID-19 pandemic in phases I, II and III, based on available scientific evidence and the consensus of a group of experts in these pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The document is based on the evidence available in the literature so far on SARSCoV-2 and the experience of the authors in the management of COVID-19 in their institutions. A narrative review of the literature was conducted, and a modified nominal group technique was used due to the extraordinary restrictions of assembly and mobility during the pandemic. RESULTS: Recommendations are made regarding the epidemiological evaluation of patients before surgery, the management of positive patients, the epidemiological measures for healthcare personnel, the management of renal colic, the type of anesthesia, endourological surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, hospitalization, clinical tests, out-patient service and priorities on the surgical waiting list. CONCLUSION: Treatment of Urolithiasis in COVID-19 pandemic calls for prioritization of patients, maximum efficiency in treatments, adequate protection of healthcare personnel, and the implementation of telemedicine as a measure to reduce patient attendance to the hospital

A clinical evaluation of the new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope (UscopePU3022): an international prospective multicentered study.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the clinical performance of a new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope (UscopePU3022). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out across 11 centers (July-Oct. 2017). The UscopePU3022 was assessed regarding ease of insertion; deflection, image quality, maneuverability and overall performance using either a visual analog* or Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 56 procedures were performed in 11 centers (16 surgeons) with the indication being renal stones in 83%. The median score for ease of scope insertion was 10 (3-10). Intraoperative maneuverability was rated as 'good' in 38% and 'very good' in 52%. Visual quality was rated as 'poor or bad' in 18%, 'fair' in 37% and 'good or very good' in 43%. Two scopes failed intraoperatively (4%). Preoperative and postoperative median upward and downward deflection was 270 degrees. Compared to standard flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) maneuverability was rated as 'equivalent' in 30% and 'better' in 60%; visual quality was 'worse' in 38% and 'equivalent or better' in 62%; limb fatigue scores were 'better' in 86%; and overall performance was 'worse' in 55% and 'equivalent or better' in 45%. CONCLUSIONS: UscopeTM3022 performed well with regards to maneuverability, deflection and limb fatigue and appears to be at least non-inferior to standard f-URS with regards to these parameters. Poor image quality is a concern for UscopePU3022 with it receiving a low overall performance rating when compared to standard f-URS. Despite this it scored highly when investigators were asked if they would use it in their practice if it was cost-effective to do so.

Characterising endourologist learning curve during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: implications on occupational dose and patients.

In this study we have characterised the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures over 301 cases for six years. Different surrogate parameters of clinical expertise have been used, such as dose area product, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time and personal equivalent doses. In addition, two different endourologists have been monitored; one of whom had specific Radiation Protection training (ICRP 85). Eye lens dose was estimated from thermoluminescent dosimeters. Significant differences were observed between both endourologists, especially in the fluoroscopy time. Finally, both entrance skin dose and effective doses of patients have been determined.

Characterizing endourologist learning curve during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: implications on occupational dose and patients.

In this study we have characterized the learning curve of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures over 301 cases for six years. Different surrogate parameters of clinical expertise have been used, such as dose area product, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time and personal equivalent doses. In addition, two different endourologists have been monitored; one of whom was subjected to a specific Radiation Protection training (ICRP 85). Eye lens dose is estimated from thermoluminescent dosimeters. Significant differences are observed between both endourologists, especially in the fluoroscopy time. Finally, both entrance skin dose and effective doses of patients have been determined.

[Techniques for percutaneous access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.] / Técnicas para el acceso percutáneo durante la nefrolitotomía percutánea.

The creation of the access is one of the main steps in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, the most complicated for many urologists and the one that limited most the universalization of the technique. From a purely technical point of view, it includes puncture of the excretory tract and dilatation of the percutaneous tract to end with the introduction of an Amplatz type working sheath. The objective of the puncture is to try to access the excretory system through the renal papilla, minimizing the risk of bleeding. The puncture may be guided by ultrasound, fluoroscopy, both, under endoscopic or laparoscopic control, by CT scan or MRI, or even by application of new technologies (Robotic, augmented reality, electromagnetic navigation,...). Due to the versatility and independence involved in having the ability to perform the renal puncture in the operative room, as well as its influence in the results of PCNL, it must be the urologist himself who performs this basic step of percutaneous surgery. The tract may be dilated by Alken type metallic dilators, semirrigid Amplatz type dilators or high pressure balloons. To date, there is no single ideal dilatation method, being the selection based on the endourologist's experience and the knowledge of the advantages and limitations of each option. The objective of this review is to present the main methods for puncture guiding and tract dilatation for PCNL, as well as to provide technical details to improve its result.